WhiteVision vs ENTR

The WhiteVision alternative for the order flow.

WhiteVision is known for invoice recognition and document processing into Dutch ERP and accounting packages. That works for accounts payable. The order desk has a different problem: emails, tenders, Excel lists and confirmations retyped line by line.

Why teams replace WhiteVision with ENTR

Line level, not just header fields

Not only supplier, amount and date, but every order line: item, quantity, price, discount and delivery date, matched against your own item list.

Fuzzy matching on items

Customers use their own descriptions and numbers. ENTR matches them to your catalogue and flags uncertain lines for review.

Human in the loop

Only exceptions reach an employee. Everything else flows into your ERP automatically, with a full audit trail.

Document processing

Invoice processing that knows the order

WhiteVision recognises the invoice. ENTR also knows what it belongs to: which order, which agreed price and which delivery. That removes the digging that currently lands on accounts payable.

  • Invoice lines linked back to the original order lines
  • Automatic check against agreed price, price break and discount
  • Quantity differences against the packing slip shown immediately
  • Only genuine deviations reach a person, the rest flows through
Comparison

WhiteVision vs ENTR

Invoice recognition versus order-native GenAI.

Primary focus
WhiteVision
Invoice recognition and document processing
ENTR
Orders, order confirmations and three-way matching
Technology
WhiteVision
Recognition based on OCR and templates
ENTR
LLM-native Generative AI, template-free
Level of detail
WhiteVision
Mostly header fields, limited line detail
ENTR
Full line level with item matching
Input channels
WhiteVision
Documents that are handed over
ENTR
Mailbox with filtering, including context from the message body
Exceptions
WhiteVision
Corrected manually in a queue
ENTR
Only genuine doubt goes to review, the rest is automatic
ERP integrations
WhiteVision
Aimed at accounting and ERP packages
ENTR
Native AFAS, Exact, RidderIQ, SAP, Microsoft Dynamics, MKG

Which fits when?

WhiteVision makes sense when

  • you only need the purchase invoice flow into your bookkeeping
  • header fields and an approval flow are enough
  • you have no order desk drowning in inbound email

ENTR makes sense when

  • orders, tenders and Excel lists are retyped line by line
  • you need item matching on customer descriptions
  • supplier order confirmations have to be checked
  • you want invoice, order and packing slip matched in one chain

Frequently asked questions

What is an alternative to WhiteVision?

For invoice recognition there are several comparable packages. For orders, order confirmations and quote requests arriving by email, ENTR is the alternative: template-free GenAI that processes at line level and posts straight into your ERP.

Can ENTR fully replace WhiteVision?

Yes. ENTR takes over both the order flow and the invoice flow, template-free and at line level, with three-way matching against order and packing slip. One engine instead of OCR recognition for invoices and manual work for orders.

How does ENTR handle unusual item descriptions?

ENTR matches customer descriptions and customer item numbers to your catalogue with fuzzy matching. When confidence is too low, the line is flagged clearly in the review step.

Trusted by leading teams

Delta Wines
Zuidberg
Smurfit Westrock
Voortman Steel Group
Burghouwt
Jarola Group
Heering
De Mors
Nijsen
Antoon Rijnbeek
DaklaPack Europe
Galvano Hengelo
Profipack
Fenix Industries
Seine Metaal & Snijtechniek
HSV
Boomkwekerij Boxtel
Veehof Precision Machining
Wildkamp
Delta Wines
Smurfit Westrock
Voortman Steel Group
Burghouwt
Jarola Group
Heering
De Mors
Nijsen
Antoon Rijnbeek
DaklaPack Europe
Galvano Hengelo
Profipack
Fenix Industries
Seine Metaal & Snijtechniek
HSV
Boomkwekerij Boxtel
Veehof Precision Machining
Wildkamp

Ready for order-native automation?